[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room
| From: | apiggot@rsmas.miami.edu |
| Subject: | SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:08:09 -0500 (EST) |
Third Floor CIMAS Conference Room Tuesday, February 16 12-1pm Rosely Marcal and Yan Jiang "Petrographic Comparison between Pleistocenic and Albian Shoals" by Rosely Marcal Geological survey researches commonly use the Pleistocenic oolitic shoals of the Bahamas to create sedimentological and diagenetic models for the oil industry. But, some considerations should be taken in using this example of meteoric diagenesis as an actualistic model for ancient limestone diagenesis. The geologist needs to keep in mind some factors that directly affect the meteoric and marine diagenesis: (1) the original mineralogy of the grains (aragonite, high-magnesium calcite, and low-magnesium calcite), (2) changes in the chemistry of the ocean-atmosphere over time, (3) climate, and (4) time of subaerial exposition. Pleistocene and Albian shoals yields the following differences a) The Pleistocene grains were formed in an ocean favorable to precipitate aragonite and high-magnesium while Albian rocks were formed in an ocean favorable to precipitate calcite, b) Pleistocene rocks were formed in an Ice House Episode while Albian rocks were formed in a Green House Episode, and c) the climate was warm and arid in the Albian age while it was warm and humid in the Pleistocene Epoch in the Bahamas. The similarities are that both of the shoals were deposited on tropical and subtropical land masses. The paragenetic sequence of the two sites is remarkable similar. Both shoals show facies related diagenetic changes. Fine-grained laminations are more cemented than the coarse ones. The most notable difference is in the degree of diagenetic overprint, in particular the amount of freshwater dissolution and cementation, which is mainly related to the original mineralogy of the grains. The small amount of meteoric cementation indicates that freshwater lens was either inert or did not have enough time to produce visible cement at Albian rocks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Seminars and symposia at RSMAS To unsubscribe, e-mail: seminar-unsubscribe@lists.rsmas.miami.edu For additional commands, e-mail: seminar-help@lists.rsmas.miami.edu Post to: seminar@rsmas.miami.edu
- Follow-Ups:
- SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room
- From: apiggot@rsmas.miami.edu
- SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room
- Prev by Date: SEMINAR: MAC Seminar Presents
- Next by Date: SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room
- Previous by thread: SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar - Tues April 13
- Next by thread: SEMINAR: MGG Student Seminar Tuesday 12-1 CIMAS Conference Room
- Index(es):

