Huai-Min Zhang, Tom Rossby, Dave Hebert, and Mark Prater
University of Rhode Island
hzhang@uri.edu
(Abstract received 08/01/2000 for session C)
ABSTRACT
Lagrangian observation techniques of the ocean have experienced rapid advancement in the last few decades. Isopycnal RAFOS floats make it possible to accurately track water parcel movements, and it is particularly useful in dynamic frontal regions where enhanced mixing and water property exchange can take place along tilting isopycnals that significantly intersect geopotential surfaces. Equipped with pressure, temperature and dissolved oxygen sensors, the floats, as roving current meters and hydrographers, can map out the ocean general circulation and property distributions on isopycnal surfaces. As Lagrangian particle followers, the floats provide water mass pathways and data for particle dispersion and turbulent mixing studies. Isopycnal floats have been deployed in the Gulf Stream, North Atlantic Current (NAC), and Subpolar Front (SPF) regions in separated programs. In particular, significant numbers of the floats were deployed in pairs or triplets with the aim to study relative dispersion, especially in the recently completed ACCE (Atlantic Climate Change Experiment) field program. We present single particle and relative dispersion statistics from the above observations. Specifically, we discuss the mean and eddy decomposition, shear versus turbulent dispersion, the pdf (probability density function) distribution of the turbulent flow, and the laws governing the single and relative dispersion at different stages (i.e. different time and spatial scales). We discuss our results for different regions. For example, eddy kinetic energy (EKE) generally decreases from the Gulf Stream downstream to the Iceland Basin, but locally enhanced EKE was found over the Mid Atlantic Ridge, and south and west of the Rockall Plateau where the NE-flowing NAC/SPF water encounters the Mediterranean water. Compared to the Newfoundland Basin, the Iceland Basin has a longer integral time scale but smaller turbulent diffusivity for single particle dispersion. We also point out that inadequate mean-eddy separation and/or data limitation could result in different conclusions.